Atomic Wallet vs Exodus: Which Wallet Takes The Crown? 👑

Atomic Wallet supports over 300 cryptocurrencies across 30 blockchains such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, BNB, Avalanche, Solana and many others.

Besides support for a wide range of tokens such as BTC, ETH, AVAX, SOL and MATIC, Atomic also supports multiple stablecoins such as Tether, TrueUSD, USDC, and Origin Dollar.

On the other hand, Exodus supports 50 blockchains such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Avalanche, Cosmos and others and over 1,000 cryptocurrencies.

Exodus also offers support for a wide range of stablecoins such as USDC, USDT, PAX, GUSD, TUSD, and BUSD across multiple blockchains.

Atomic Wallet boasts a non-custodial design, which is integral to its security framework. As with all non-custodial wallets, the primary advantage is that users private keys remain stored on their personal devices.

This decentralized storage approach, spreading assets across millions of devices rather than a central repository, offers a robust resistance to potential cyber-attacks.

However, with this structure, the responsibility of safeguarding assets lies squarely with the user. It's paramount to securely store the password and the critical 12-word mnemonic seed phrase.

While Atomic Wallet has maintained a record of never being compromised, concerns were raised when a report by Coindesk highlighted security vulnerabilities identified by the third-party audit firm, Least Authority.

Their recommendations urged Atomic Wallet to apprise users of these vulnerabilities and advised against the wallet's use until the identified issues were addressed.

In response, Atomic Wallet's CEO, Konstantin Gladych, clarified that certain issues identified in the audit had already been patched, while others would necessitate more extensive architectural overhauls.

Importantly, he reassured users that none of the flagged issues posed direct threats, given the wallet's non-custodial nature and local data storage.

Finally Atomic Wallet is only partly open source and the wallet currently doesn't integrate with any hardware wallets like Ledger and Trezor.

On the other hand, Exodus offers users an advanced level of security as private keys and transaction data are stored locally on the users' device. This means that no one but the user has access to their funds or personal information.

Additionally, Exodus makes use of a secure encryption system which ensures that sensitive data is not exposed to external threats.

Exodus also features a built-in backup tool that allows users to easily recover their wallets in case of a system crash or other unfortunate events.

Exodus places a strong emphasis on ensuring top-tier security for its users. The company employs world-class security experts, including some of the top 10 researchers from the renowned platform, HackerOne.

The company uses the most current secure design principles, buttressed by their SSDLC and direct consultations. Further enhancing the wallet's safety, Exodus maintains a rigorous manual audit process paired with secure tooling and automation.

Exodus is finally also offering support for hardware wallets such as Trezor. At the time of writing, they are unfortunately not offering support with other popular hardware wallets such as Ledger & Keystone.

Between Atomic Wallet and Exodus, users are presented with two capable wallets for digital asset management, each with its strengths.

Atomic Wallet impresses with its comprehensive feature set, including the in-wallet exchange functionality, versatile fiat-to-crypto buying options, staking for over 20 cryptocurrencies, and support for a rich assortment of NFT formats across several blockchains.

Its support for 300 cryptocurrencies across 30 blockchains showcases its commitment to ecosystem versatility.

However, security concerns, particularly following the audit by Least Authority that revealed vulnerabilities, should give users pause. And a further lack of hardware wallet integration further exacerbates these concerns.

Exodus has emerged as a solid option for users who put emphasis on aesthetics, a streamlined user experience and robust security. Its ability to sync between the desktop, mobile and browser wallets ensures seamless compatibility.

Additionally, while its in-app exchange features and staking options might be fewer compared to Atomic Wallet, its integration with Compound Finance, allowing users to earn interest, adds a unique flavor to its offerings.

Its unblemished security record complemented by Trezor hardware wallet integration, elevates user confidence in asset protection. And while both wallets offer non-custodial access, Exodus support for over 50 blockchains far exceeds the 30 supported by Atomic.

The clear winner in this comparison is Exodus for it's wide support of numerous blockchains and coins, features such as swaps, nfts, staking and more.

The simple fact that Atomic Wallet has seen it's security compromised means that it will take much work to regain the trust of it's users.

Between Atomic Wallet and Exodus, users are presented with two capable wallets for digital asset management, each with its strengths.

Atomic Wallet impresses with its comprehensive feature set, including the in-wallet exchange functionality, versatile fiat-to-crypto buying options, staking for over 20 cryptocurrencies, and support for a rich assortment of NFT formats across several blockchains.

Its support for 300 cryptocurrencies across 30 blockchains showcases its commitment to ecosystem versatility. However, security concerns, particularly following the audit by Least Authority that revealed vulnerabilities, should give users pause. And a further lack of hardware wallet integration further exacerbates these concerns.

Exodus has emerged as a solid option for users who put emphasis on aesthetics, a streamlined user experience and robust security. Its ability to sync between the desktop, mobile and browser wallets ensures seamless compatibility.

Additionally, while its in-app exchange features and staking options might be fewer compared to Atomic Wallet, its integration with Compound Finance, allowing users to earn interest, adds a unique flavor to its offerings.

Its unblemished security record complemented by Trezor hardware wallet integration, elevates user confidence in asset protection. And while both wallets offer non-custodial access, Exodus support for over 50 blockchains far exceeds the 30 supported by Atomic.

The clear winner in this comparison is Exodus for it's wide support of numerous blockchains and coins, features such as swaps, nfts, staking and more. The simple fact that Atomic Wallet has seen it's security compromised means that it will take much work to regain the trust of it's users.